Changelog #241

blue fire frequently gets overpays, it is doing amazing right now, with tons of people coming up to me and trying to give overpays for blue fire, i've frequently gotten offers like icebreaker, or my blue fire + 3m for a p1, its basically impossible to get a blue fire without overpaying, since owners are pretty greedy knowing they can get some insane offers for it. Saying it only "occasionally" gets overpays is an understatement and is outdated.

Its no secret that blue fire and gradient pixel are performing incredibly well right now, frequently getting overpays and having very good demand. Medium demand is just outdated for gradient pixel and i think it should be on the same level of demand as blue fire. Gradient pixel frequently gets overpays, owners are pretty greedy and will not take base for it.

with the recent accuracy adjustment of yellow 5 2025 to 20m (and its prior value was 18.5m), the value of the overall shift 2025 also needs to update from 378m to 379.5m, as, when we add together the values of all the 2025 hypers (70 + 70 + 64 + 46 + 47 + 36.5 + 26 + 20), we get a total value of 379.5m, which tracks following the previous adjustment of an increase of 1.5m value to yellow 5 2025. this doesnt mean that shift level 5 2025 is rising or some bs like that, its simply an accuracy adjustment. this only takes into account RAW value and not pull powers, so theres not much else to say about this

with the recent accuracy adjustment of red 4 to 26 mil (a drop of 1m from its former value of 27m), the total value of shift 4 also needs to decrease by 1m, since, when we add together the totals of all the hyper level 4s, we get 54 + 47 + 42 + 32 + 26 + 20 + 19 + 14 (amounting to a total of 254m, which tracks because the old value of shift 4 was 255). the shift values only take into account the raw values of each individual level 4 hyper and not their pull powers, so this needs updating

alright before you immediately downvote: vanta recently hasn't been doing the greatest, and has been slightly losing demand for a while now, as a matter of fact, most people agree that vanta should have medium demand, and due to that, almost nobody overpays for vanta these days, with the only times that somebody will overpay for vanta is if they are giving low demand or they need it immediately. however, its still known that vanta is a bit rare to find when trading, so it should still keep that note. overall, vanta's note should be changed to "Rare to find" only, since it almost never gets overpays from anybody nowadays, plus the fact that surprisingly not alot of people want vanta for it being a decently demanded item.

Just like arachnid, banana is seeing an increase in demand due to the fact it was overdropped. Because it was overdropped, some people are trying to stock up on them while they’re cheap waiting for the value to bounce back. Banana had also 100% stopped dropping, so people are able to look for it again without fear of losing value in the future. Because of this, I believe banana car deserves this demand increase.

I mean, do I really need to explain this, Arachnid just had a small rise, but with it being low demand, it just makes absolutely no sense, how can something low demanded rise?? So I decided to suggest that Arachnid should be medium demand rather than decent cause we don't want it to be way too hyped up and just have a huge crash, so having arachnid medium demand is better for now rather than decent.

Common Trades:

Clean Beam Hybrid -> Clean Arachnid

Molten M12 + Torero

Parisian + Aperture + Orion/Snake